# Architectural Review Summary — post-memo ## Task and commits reviewed - Task: `post-memo` - Reviewed the merged branch ending at `8e2693ad08` (refactorer), which carried: - `d071b21`/`c9556be` — specifier Post-a-Memo Gherkin spec + feature backlog - `514298b` — coder implementation with acceptance pipeline - `64a7f78` — refactorer merge of coder work - `8e2693a` — refactorer memo-post complexity reduction - Merged into `swarmforge-architect` (fast-forward) and processed as a batch. ## Architectural findings and fixes applied Reviewed UI/Core separation, dependency rule, information hiding/encapsulation, and local code quality. 1. **Testable core behind small adapters (good).** `src/services/memo-post.js` is a testable module free of UI/IO concerns. It injects `wallet` and `feed` adapters (minimal-slp-wallet surface + feed reflection), so OP_RETURN/broadcast and UI concerns stay outside the core. Environmentally unsuitable I/O is confined to adapter boundaries. Dependency direction is inward. 2. **Acceptance pipeline separation (good).** `acceptance/lib/{generate,runtime,handlers}` are the project-specific components the APS spec prescribes. The feature is parsed by the **APS-supplied Babashka `gherkin-parser`** (procured fresh from github.com/unclebob/Acceptance-Pipeline-Specification on first use), not reimplemented. `handlers.js` drives real core behavior through fake wallet/feed adapters so the run is deterministic and offline. 3. **Information hiding (good).** memo-post hides the Memo `0x6d02` prefix and broadcast mechanics; handlers only assert observable outcomes (broadcast prefix, feed reflection, empty/length rejection). 4. **Fix applied — runner adapter added.** Built the project-specific persistent runner adapter required by `gherkin-mutator` at `acceptance/lib/runner-worker.js` (newline-delimited JSON protocol; evaluates each mutated feature IR through the same runtime/handlers and reports `test_failure|test_success|infrastructure_error`). 5. **Manifests updated by tools (permitted).** The language mutation tool embedded its differential footer manifest in `src/services/memo-post.js`; the APS mutator wrote the acceptance-mutation scenario manifest into `specs/post-memo.feature`. Both are normal tool output and were left for the tooling, not hand-edited. ## Verification results - **Unit (`node --test`):** 7/7 pass (`memo-post.test.js`). - **Acceptance (normal):** all 6 scenario executions pass. - **Mutation (`mutate4javascript` differential, `--max-workers 8`):** `memo-post.js` — **killed 7, survived 0, uncovered 0**. Full kill. - **DRY (`dry4javascript src`):** no duplicate candidates. - **Gherkin acceptance mutation (soft):** 6 discovered; **1 killed**, **5 survived**, 0 errors. - Killed: the empty-memo boundary — dithering the `" "` example makes the validation branch fail the scenario, confirming the empty-rejection guardrail is connected to the example data. - Survived (documented equivalents): message-content dithers in the valid-memo scenario and the over-long scenarios. The tests treat the message as opaque data and assert the *same* (mutated) text is composed and reflected, so changing one character leaves the exercised branch identical. These are acceptable equivalent survivors, not missing guardrails. - **Property tests:** none present in this project. ## Suite status - Unit + acceptance suites pass; mutation fully kills source-level mutants for the testable core. Gherkin acceptance mutation has 5 documented-equivalent survivors. ## Handoffs sent - `git_handoff` → coder, refactorer (priority `00`, task `post-memo`), to review the architectural commit (runner adapter + tool manifests). By architect.